Polarison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: pricing and benchmarks

DeepSeek V4 Pro is 67% cheaper on input tokens ($1.32 vs $4.00 per 1M). DeepSeek V4 Pro is 80% cheaper on output tokens ($3.96 vs $20.00 per 1M). On our document Q&A workload (50,000 questions a month), DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $646.80 a month versus $2,200 for Claude Opus 5.5, 71% less. Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for Claude Opus 5.5 yet.

Prices verified September 26, 2026.

Which should you choose?

Overall capability
Too close to call

Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for Claude Opus 5.5 yet.

Price
DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.98 per 1M tokens (3:1 input-to-output mix) vs $8.00 for Claude Opus 5.5, 75% less.

Pricing and specs

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
API model IDclaude-opus-5-5deepseek-v4-pro
Input / 1M tokens$4.00$1.32
Cached input / 1M tokens$0.20$0.044
Output / 1M tokens$20.00$3.96
Long-context rates——
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens384K tokens
Batch discount50% off—

Benchmarks

Claude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.5
GPQA Diamond· Science reasoning—88.9%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1–3)· Advanced math—64.6%
SimpleQA Verified· Factual accuracy—52.9%
ARC-AGI-2· Abstract reasoning—61.3%
DeepSWE· Coding——
APEX-Agents· Agentic work——

Source: Epoch AI, best recorded result per model (CC BY 4.0). A dash means no published score. See all benchmarks

Monthly cost for real workloads

WorkloadClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V4 ProDifference
Support chatbot
100,000 replies a month, ~1,500 input tokens (system prompt + history) and ~400 output tokens each.
$1,400$356.40DeepSeek V4 Pro 75% cheaper
Document Q&A (RAG)
50,000 questions a month with ~8,000 tokens of retrieved context and ~600 output tokens each.
$2,200$646.80DeepSeek V4 Pro 71% cheaper
Coding agent
10,000 agent steps a month, ~40,000 input tokens each (70% read from the prompt cache) and ~2,000 output tokens.
$936.00$249.92DeepSeek V4 Pro 73% cheaper

Estimates use standard list prices and ignore cache-write surcharges. Different tokenizers can count the same text differently, so test with your own prompts.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro cost calculator

Standard-tier list prices. Long-context rates apply automatically where the provider publishes a threshold. Excludes cache-write surcharges, taxes, batch and volume discounts.

Claude Opus 5.5 pricing notes

Anthropic’s recommended default model for most workloads, with adaptive thinking always on.

  • Cache reads cost 5% of the input price, against 10% on Claude Opus 5 and Sonnet 5.
  • Cache writes cost $5 (5-minute cache) or $8 (1-hour cache) per 1M tokens.
  • US-only inference (inference_geo: "us") costs 1.1x.
Anthropic official pricing ↗

DeepSeek V4 Pro pricing notes

DeepSeek’s larger V4 model with thinking and non-thinking modes and tool calls.

  • Prices shown are peak rates. Off-peak rates are half: peak hours are 01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC, Monday to Friday.
  • Vision input is not supported.
DeepSeek official pricing ↗

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is 67% cheaper on input tokens ($1.32 vs $4.00 per 1M). DeepSeek V4 Pro is 80% cheaper on output tokens ($3.96 vs $20.00 per 1M). On our document Q&A workload (50,000 questions a month), DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $646.80 a month versus $2,200 for Claude Opus 5.5, 71% less.
Which is more capable, Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for Claude Opus 5.5 yet.
How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost per 1M tokens?
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00 per 1M input tokens and $20.00 per 1M output tokens, and $0.20 per 1M cached input tokens on Anthropic’s standard tier.
How much does DeepSeek V4 Pro cost per 1M tokens?
DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.32 per 1M input tokens and $3.96 per 1M output tokens, and $0.044 per 1M cached input tokens on DeepSeek’s standard tier.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Both offer a 1M-token context window.

Related comparisons