Polarison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: pricing and benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($2.00 vs $4.00 per 1M). Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 50% cheaper on output tokens ($10.00 vs $20.00 per 1M). On our document Q&A workload (50,000 questions a month), Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $1,100 a month versus $2,200 for GPT-5.6 Sol, 50% less. Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for Claude Sonnet 5.5 yet.

Prices verified September 28, 2026.

Which should you choose?

Overall capability
Too close to call

Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for Claude Sonnet 5.5 yet.

Price
Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 input-to-output mix) vs $8.00 for GPT-5.6 Sol, 50% less.

Pricing and specs

Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
API model IDclaude-sonnet-5-5gpt-5.6-sol
Input / 1M tokens$2.00$4.00
Cached input / 1M tokens$0.20$0.40
Output / 1M tokens$10.00$20.00
Long-context rates—$8.00 in / $30.00 out on long-context requests
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens
Batch discount50% off50% off

Benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 Sol
Epoch Capabilities Index—161.8
GPQA Diamond· Science reasoning—91.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1–3)· Advanced math—89.1%
SimpleQA Verified· Factual accuracy—69.7%
ARC-AGI-2· Abstract reasoning—92.5%
DeepSWE· Coding—72.7%
APEX-Agents· Agentic work—40.0%

Source: Epoch AI, best recorded result per model (CC BY 4.0). A dash means no published score. See all benchmarks

Monthly cost for real workloads

WorkloadClaude Sonnet 5.5GPT-5.6 SolDifference
Support chatbot
100,000 replies a month, ~1,500 input tokens (system prompt + history) and ~400 output tokens each.
$700.00$1,400Claude Sonnet 5.5 50% cheaper
Document Q&A (RAG)
50,000 questions a month with ~8,000 tokens of retrieved context and ~600 output tokens each.
$1,100$2,200Claude Sonnet 5.5 50% cheaper
Coding agent
10,000 agent steps a month, ~40,000 input tokens each (70% read from the prompt cache) and ~2,000 output tokens.
$496.00$992.00Claude Sonnet 5.5 50% cheaper

Estimates use standard list prices and ignore cache-write surcharges. Different tokenizers can count the same text differently, so test with your own prompts.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol cost calculator

Standard-tier list prices. Long-context rates apply automatically where the provider publishes a threshold. Excludes cache-write surcharges, taxes, batch and volume discounts.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 pricing notes

Anthropic’s fast mid-tier model, successor to Claude Sonnet 5 at the same price.

  • Cache writes cost $2.50 (5-minute cache) or $4 (1-hour cache) per 1M tokens.
  • US-only inference (inference_geo: "us") costs 1.1x.
Anthropic official pricing ↗

GPT-5.6 Sol pricing notes

OpenAI’s flagship GPT-5.6 model for complex professional work.

  • Promotional pricing, available at least through November 21, 2026.
  • Cache writes are billed at $5 per 1M tokens.
  • Regional (data residency) endpoints add a 10% uplift.
OpenAI official pricing ↗

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($2.00 vs $4.00 per 1M). Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 50% cheaper on output tokens ($10.00 vs $20.00 per 1M). On our document Q&A workload (50,000 questions a month), Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $1,100 a month versus $2,200 for GPT-5.6 Sol, 50% less.
Which is more capable, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
Epoch AI has not published a capability index score for Claude Sonnet 5.5 yet.
How much does Claude Sonnet 5.5 cost per 1M tokens?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens, and $0.20 per 1M cached input tokens on Anthropic’s standard tier.
How much does GPT-5.6 Sol cost per 1M tokens?
GPT-5.6 Sol costs $4.00 per 1M input tokens and $20.00 per 1M output tokens, and $0.40 per 1M cached input tokens on OpenAI’s standard tier.
Which has the larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.6 Sol?
GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window: 1.05M tokens versus 1M for Claude Sonnet 5.5.

Related comparisons